Friday, March 12, 2010

The Failure of Spinrad's "Third World Worlds" from a Technical Perspective

For those unfamiliar with the title, what I'm referring to is Norman Spinrad's On Books column. It's drawn a couple of reactions (myself included) in the past week but what I want to focus on is how the essay itself falters as an essay, as opposed to its morality, ethics, or simple awareness (other people, from N.K. Jemisin to Nick Mamatas, cover that ground already).

Spinrad's "Third World Worlds" falters at two points. The first is his introduction: his thesis can be summed up as "American/British writers writing about other countries." What's drawing the ire of most people, however, are his opening lines, everything from his unfamiliarity with science fiction outside of the First World to Octavia Butler not being African American. This fails because most people don't even get to Spinrad's main argument: they're already incensed by his faulty opening. His entire discourse on Third World countries and Mike Resnick is honestly there to prepare the reader for the succeeding paragraphs and not his main points. If we edit the article for example and started with "Paul McAuley is a British writer...", Spinrad's thesis would have remained intact and wouldn't have resulted in this week's conflagration. Nick Mamatas would have still called him on his interpretation of Ian McDonald's Brasyl, and Saladin Ahmed would have still rightly summed it up as "Please, please, please, if you are not Brazilian or Thai or Turkish, don't tell me how convincingly or authentically American (or British) author #3462 depicts Brazil or Thailand or Turkey!" but at least it wouldn't be this big of an issue.

That's not to dismiss Spinrad's opening paragraphs. They are legitimate concerns but when you analyze it, the article could have discarded them. With their inclusion, however, Spinrad is operating from a false supposition. If this were fiction, it's akin to Spinrad writing a murder mystery except his prologue doesn't actually result in the murder of any victim, without which, there can be no investigation that drives the rest of the narrative (and it's not the type of investigation that ends with "he/she was never murdered to begin with!").

The second failure of Spinrad is what he focused on. For example, we have this contentious paragraph:
"So, for now at least, and in the apparent absence of a significant body of science fiction written by born and bred Africans, this Caucasian American is probably the closest thing there is or has been to an African science fiction writer, with the exception of Octavia Butler. Who did write the same sort of thing, and did it well, and was Black to boot, but I use that politically incorrect word rather than “African American” because aside from her genetic heritage she was no more African than Mike Resnick."
Spinrad could have elaborated on this further and made it his central thesis, instead of talking about other American and British writers and their Third World fiction. It wouldn't make him any less erroneous, but at least the controversy would have been intentional, instead of a throwaway paragraph.

In fiction, this is the equivalent of creating a very compelling character, and making them an extra. In Star Wars, it's like demoting Han Solo to a random rebel that dies in the initial skirmish.

Wednesday, March 10, 2010

March 10, 2010 Links and Plugs

Home construction has begun! You can read my packing exploits here.

In other news, go pre-order Dark Faith edited by Maurice Broaddus and Jerry Gordon.

Interviews
Advice/Articles
News
A new Charles de Lint release:

The Mystery of Grace by Charles de Lint

Essay: Fandom and Piracy (Part 2)

Every Wednesday, I have an essay or feature article on any topic that catches my fancy!

Part 1 here.

Arguably the industry that profited (not financially but in terms of popularity) the most from piracy is anime and manga. Today's anime/manga fandom was built on the bedrock of piracy. How did Americans develop a fascination for Japanese animation and comics (and not, say, Chinese Manhua or Filipino komiks)? Well, there's the poorly translated cartoons back in the day. Titles like Astro Boy might have been competently translated, but other titles were censored or badly adapted. Take for example Battle of the Planets which turned a world-hopping science team into a planet-hopping task force... and gained a robot companion to boot (which isn't to say this cheesy adaptation didn't garner its own following). The non-mainstream anime community developed by bringing copies (on VHS and Betamax) of shows into the US and airing it in public and private venues. When this wasn't enough--watching a show in a language you didn't understand could only go so far--fans started to translate the shows themselves by adding subtitles (called fansubs). Again, this gave birth to a micro-economy of passing around fansubbed videos or selling them (theoretically) at cost to other fans.

While the distribution of fansubs was clearly a labor of love, that doesn't mean it wasn't illegal. At worst, opportunists made the selling of fansubs a business (which is the case here in the Philippines), even if the videos themselves had notices that stated they weren't for sale. At best, the fansubs was exploiting the limitations of the rights holders: the shows the fansubbers translated typically wasn't licensed by anyone in the US, so no one came after them (and this kind of logic is probably what makes the Google Settlement palatable to non-authors). The latter practice is perpetuated until the present day, although anime/manga has developed to a point where there are right holders in the US, and come into conflict with fansubbers.

Of course it could be argued that allowing the perpetuation of these anime pirates was a good thing for the parent companies. The fansubbers, after all, were driving interest for the said intellectual property and was a form of marketing, albeit an unsanctioned one. In fact, some of the fans who watched the fansubs would later on purchase the official versions when it was licensed locally. (Unfortunately, there's also a fan segment that refuses to purchase anything that's commercially sold, everything from viewing the phenomenon as a "sell-out" to entitlement issues.)

For the Japanese manga industry, this eventually paid off in Hong Kong. For quite some time, Hong Kong publishers were translating Japanese manga into the local language and selling them--all without paying a licensing fee to the Japanese companies. Eventually however, these publishers saw how lucrative the business was and decided to make their business legit. (More info can be found here.) If you're an optimist, you could interpret this phenomenon as the Japanese publishers winning because they sold the rights to one of their franchises without lifting a finger! If you're a pessimist, you could view the incident as the years of "lost revenue" committed by the pirates-turned-legal-business. (Does either side of the argument sound familiar?)

The Internet, of course, was a game changer in the anime/manga community. Fansubbers started distributing their titles through the Internet (following a mail-order type of business), and later, as technologies made broadband connections more prevalent, available for download. The real revolution however was for manga. At this point, US manga publishers still didn't know how to market their product. A lot of formats were attempted: American comics (the pamphlets with left-to-right printing), digest-sized graphic novels, oversized graphic novels, phonebook anthologies, etc. During this period of uncertainty, fans were pointing to Japanese vendors (or their counterpart in the Bay Area) to purchase the original Japanese manga, and then created or referred to websites which had line by line translations. This wasn't so bad really (fans had to buy the original manga after all to get the context of the translation) until the advent of broadband connection. Soon, it was feasible to upload scans of the entire manga, and from there, it evolved into people *combining* the translations and the scanned manga into one neat package (which is what's called "scanlations").

What's interesting with anime/manga fansubbing and scanlating is that through the ease of communication and management via the Internet, this form of piracy became industrially efficient. For example, in the case of fansubs, one guy in Japan would provide the raw video, another person in Asia would provide the translation, and a different person in the US would do the timing of the scripts. In the case of scanlations, someone would provide the raw scans, another the "cleanup" of the scanned images, another the translations, etc. It's a very specialized industry that's not hampered by corporate bureaucracy: for popular titles, you can expect a fansub or scan within the same week of release (or sometimes, even sooner than that in the case of leaks).

Right now, the anime/manga pirates are divided into two groups: those that are semi-illegal since they only translate and distribute titles which aren't licensed locally (and when it does get licensed, they encourage you to support and purchase the product) and those that are clearly illegal as their distribution competes with existing rights holders (and because of the translation and copyright delay, the pirates publish their material sooner) and whose fanbase gets angry with local companies that send cease-and-desist letters. What's interesting to note is that while I'm aware of this as an "insider", the lay people are completely unaware of this distinction. I've seen friends for example freely link to manga available on the web, and at best, they are unaware that they are, in fact, pointing to sites that violate copyright law.

That's not to say current companies licensing anime/manga aren't benefiting from this black market either. Fan interest for example can be a gauge as to whether a title should be licensed locally or not. And at the end of the day, anime/manga's black market is only a minority when you compare it to the mass-market. One of the America's best-selling manga for example is Naruto, and scanlations of the title is still prevalent to this very day. Is the latter hurting the sales of the former? Is it boosting it? Or better yet, in what proportion of both?

Tuesday, March 09, 2010

March 9, 2010 Links and Plugs

Interviews
Advice/Articles
News
And our international speculative fiction highlight:

Shine: An Anthology of Optimistic SF edited by Jetse de Vries

Monday, March 08, 2010

March 8, 2010 Links and Plugs

Renovations on the house start this week and my allergies are acting up from packing all my books (*sniff* *sniff* no one should go to the torture of forcing to categorize their books in boxes!). Which also means a lack of sleep for me as I'm sick and have trouble breathing.

Interviews
Advice/Articles
News
Currently reading:

Warriors edited by George R. R. Martin and Gardner Dozois

Book/Magazine Review: The World House by Guy Adams

Every Monday, I'll be doing bite-sized book/magazine reviews.

Disclosure: The publisher sent a review copy for the purposes of this review.

Let me get this out of the way: The World House isn't a perfect novel. It's a book that excels in some areas and simply falls flat in others. It's not that the latter is horrible, but the mere competency of the writing simply kills the potential that Guy Adams establishes early on. To the author's credit, his good points appear early on.

Take for example the issue of characterization. In the first chapter, the prose immediately sucks you in as Adams presents a flawed but compelling character in the form of Miles Caulfield. He has a distinct voice and for the first few chapters, the reader is buying into his predicament. Problems however start to crop up as the novel progresses, and part of this is the book's ambition. The World House is presented as vast and encompassing, and it's justified that the author injects multiple points of view. This is a tricky technique however and unfortunately, Adams fails to pull it off--at least for the rest of the cast. Some characters end up more developed than others and this reader wishes that each one of them could have been built up as elegantly as Miles Caulfield. That's not to say they don't end up with distinct voices--they do--but the reader isn't as invested in them. Sometimes, this can be attributed to Adams shifting perspectives too often too quickly. At other times, it's because their presentation is merely mediocre. This issue partially resolves itself towards the latter half of the book as the characters form into parties, limiting the perspective shift, but by then, the characters feel like they're being moved by the plot.

There's also the issue of interludes and I'm somewhere in the middle. On one hand, it's a stark contrast from the rest of the chapters, especially early on. If the fantastical element in the chapters are subtle, the interlude hammers to the reader that hey, this is speculative fiction. I also can't reprimand it out of hand as it does foreshadow events in the story, but iit can at times feel like a blunt tool.

What I can't fault Adams however is his ambition. Conceptually, the book draws in various science fiction elements and brews them into one pot. While some of these points could have been presented more elegantly, they do manage to get their message across. Is it worth putting up with less than stellar prose? I honestly found it okay. I'm not dying to read the sequel, but if it's handed to me, I'll probably put up with it in the hopes that Adams's consistency improves.

Friday, March 05, 2010

March 5, 2010 Links and Plugs

To quote David J. Schwartz: "I always carry a book, because otherwise I'm afraid people might talk to me."

Interviews
Advice/Articles
And from Tachyon (and awesome cover by John Picacio):

The Best of Joe R. Lansdale by Joe R. Lansdale

Thursday, March 04, 2010

March 4, 2010 Links and Plugs

I just want to mention how shiny the new Ideomancer is.

And check out Small Beer Press's catalog.

Nikki Alfar's short story, "Bearing Fruit," is up at Fantasy Magazine.

Interviews
Advice/Articles
News
And the latest Clarkesworld issue:

Wednesday, March 03, 2010

Essay: Fandom and Piracy (Part 1)

Every Wednesday, I have an essay or feature article on any topic that catches my fancy!

A sensitive topic to fellow writers is the issue of piracy (and in a certain way, the Google Settlement is appalling because it can be interpreted as as form of piracy). I was pondering on the subject matter and book piracy is both an old and new thing, at least compared to other media.

It's old in the sense that before the Internet, it was possible to pirate (in the sense of copying the text, as opposed to say, selling books with their covers torn out) books: the photocopier. Granted, it wasn't efficient (how many hours did you have to spend photocopying a novel?) and wasn't dirt cheap, but it was possible. (Here in the Philippines, there's an entire economy of photocopying textbooks and other university required readings.) It's new in the sense that with the advent of the Internet, there's a huge surge of pirated books, at least compared to other media. For example, while the music industry is reeling from rampant mp3s, before then, piracy was already existent. Who's never created a mix tape? Or when it comes to video, who's never taped a show or movie on VHS or Betamax? (And again, here in the Philippines, small businesses thrived on Betamax and VHS copies.) Unlike photocopiers, creating a copy of a cassette or video was relatively cheap compared to the retail price of the original material. For me, the biggest difference between the pre-Internet days and post-Internet days is that piracy in the former went undetected--not in the sense that it didn't exist, but companies didn't have a verifiable method of tracking the actual number of copies distributed (not that the Internet is any better, but Torrent sites reveal to the public a minimum amount).

I don't live in the US, but I'd like to think there were institutions that discouraged book piracy to a certain extent. Take for example the public library (I make the US vs. Philippines distinction because we don't have a lot of public libraries here). What the Internet changed is the convenience of procuring a book. In the case of the best-sellers, a quick Google search is easier than commuting to your local library. There is also the issue of availability. For example, I was shocked to discover that US public libraries didn't have every book in the world. You theoretically could obtain an unavailable book through inter-library loan but that takes time. With the Internet, while certainly not every book in the world is being pirated, it's thorough enough for most people (and in a certain sense, you know you've "made it" as an author when your novels and short stories are being pirated in the mainstream channels).

When it comes to the music industry, I don't think radio is a fair comparison to libraries. The problem with radio is that you couldn't replay the music (unlike a book which you can reread) and specific songs came at random schedules. The pioneering act of the Internet is that it provided entertainment on demand, whether it was music, movies, literature, or games.

The other reason why piracy is rampant with the Internet is because it's so easy to replicate material. Take for example video game piracy. In the days when Nintendo and Sega where the dominant console manufacturers and used cartridges as the medium for games, piracy was almost nonexistent. Cartridges were expensive to pirate after all. The only time I saw pirated Nintendo games was with the advent of the Family Computer Disk System, which used diskettes instead of cartridges (there would be something similar with the Super Famicom and disks). Pirates would later replicate Gameboy cartridges and sell them at a cheaper price than the originals, but the difference in cost wasn't as significant. The revolution of video game piracy was with the popularity of the Sony Playstation and its use of optical drives. Suddenly, games were being sold at a tenth of their retail price, and vendors here (yes, the Philippines is piracy nirvana) were stocking titles by the spindle. Nintendo's subsequent consoles like the Nintendo 64 didn't get much traction in the Philippines because the local economy couldn't support it--cartridge-based games wasn't as cheap to manufacture (barring overwhelming successes which was the case with the GameBoy).

March 3, 2010 Links and Plugs

If you want to help Chile... (via Cheryl Morgan)

Interviews
Advice/Articles
News
Happy book release day:

Spellwright by Blake Charlton

Tuesday, March 02, 2010

March 2, 2010 Links and Plugs

Interviews
Advice/Articles
News
Another anthology that I'm anticipating:

Best Horror of the Year 2 edited by Ellen Datlow

Monday, March 01, 2010

March 1, 2010 Links and Plugs

It's March!!!

And unfortunately, I also get the news that I need a new place to live as our house undergoes renovation.

Also, forgot to mention that my interview with Christian Dunn on Black Library's print on demand line went up last week at SF Signal.

Interviews
Advice/Articles
News
Out this month! Go buy:

Book/Magazine Review: The Kosher Guide to Imaginary Animals by Ann & Jeff VanderMeer

Every Monday, I'll be doing bite-sized book/magazine reviews.

Disclosure: The publisher sent a review copy for the purposes of this review.

I plead guilty to not paying attention when the VanderMeers originally announced that they'll be writing The Kosher Guide to Imaginary Animals. The first thing that eluded me was the term kosher. Little did I know this was related to Jewish tradition (thankfully the introduction brought me up to speed). The second element that caught me off-guard was that I expected this to be a book of fictional creatures when it fact, it draws from existing mythology and legend (such as the Brazilian encantado [which, I might add, is very different from the Filipino encantado] or the Mongolian death worm).

Having said that, this is a really fun book. A good part of the credit goes to John Coulthart whose accompanying illustrations give life to the book. While there are some encyclopedia-like books that needs to be digested one section at a time, that's not the case here: the selection is small, the writing is brief, and the comedy is upbeat. But what really makes this work is the banter between Ann VanderMeer and Evil Monkey (Jeff VanderMeer's persona), adding a narrative thread to this nonfiction title. The reader quickly sympathizes with Ann although The Kosher Guide to Imaginary Animals wouldn't be as fun if Evil Monkey wasn't as mischievous.

Another thing to be applauded is the creature selection. For example, we have E.T. (yep, the one from the Spielberg movie) and while that's not something you'd think of eating in the first place (Evil Monkey has a gruesome imagination), the banter between our two commentators is priceless.

Each entry's layout is simple: we get the creature's name, illustration, an informal write-up, the "discussion" between Ann and Evil Monkey, and a seal of approval as to whether the said creature is kosher or not. We progress from A (Abumi-Guchi) to Z (Ziz) and before you know it, we're at the end which includes a conversation between Ann and Duff Goldman, an interview that's apt for the occasion.

The Kosher Guide to Imaginary Animals is a fun gift item and makes for a great conversation piece. Warning: sense of humor required, or else a Borges will be unleashed upon the reader.

Friday, February 26, 2010

February 26, 2010 Links and Plugs

Running late today...

Interviews
Advice/Articles
News
Another recent release:
Chill by Elizabeth Bear