Showing posts with label fantasy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label fantasy. Show all posts

Wednesday, September 19, 2007

Wizards of the Coast Discoveries Open Call

I think I missed this piece of info (or if it was lost in my constant plugging of Wizards of the Coast's various submission guidelines) but Wizards of the Coast has a new imprint called Wizards of the Coast Discoveries and features various original novels.

Moreover, it's open season for submissions (see the full guidelines here):

Submissions are accepted annually between the dates of September 1st and February 1st. Any submissions received outside of that timeframe will not be read.

This is not a contest! It is a call for proposals from professional authors and aspiring professional authors.

Please read these guidelines very carefully before submitting. We have made some changes not only to the sort of subject matter we’re interested in, but the nature of the proposals as well. Submissions that do not conform to the guidelines will not be accepted.

Our annual open call is for a speculative fiction imprint that publishes novels with science fiction, fantasy, and/or horror elements for an adult audience. What we’re most interested in are books that are set in a contemporary or historical setting but with the addition of some SF, fantasy, and/or horror elements. Because we continue to enjoy great success with our shared world fantasy lines, we’re not looking for more of that sort of thing for this imprint. Likewise we’re not too keen right now on “straight” science fiction (far future settings, extreme high tech, etc.). We’re always open to supernatural horror. We are not interested in pornography, romance, or nonfiction of any kind.

We are looking for novels for an adult audience only, so please do not send short stories, short story collections, poetry, etc., or books for young readers.

Right now there are four writers who are going to see print come 2008, and one of the more interesting blurbs is Last Dragon by J.M. McDermott. Here's what it says:
A tale of revenge that grows into something more, Last Dragon is a literary fantasy novel in the tradition of Gene Wolfe and Gabriel Garcia Marquez.
Anyway, game designer and author Ari Marmell mentioned in his blog that his novel got picked up as well, and we can expect Shades of Grey one year from now.

The Bastards of SF&F

I'm currently a lurker in a local RPG organization that's trying to promote RPGs. I've been part of it for more than five years now and one of the biggest hurdles the group has been facing is the lack of new blood. Sure, there are the occasional new faces but for the most part, whenever I attend an event, it's more or less the same people running the show. Ever since the big fandom boom in the country (which I'll associate with the popping up of The New Worlds Alliance), we've been trying to get more gamers from these other fandoms. Interested in Star Wars? We'll run a Star Wars tabletop game (alas, where were you Saga Edition two years ago?). Lord of the Rings fan? Decipher's got you covered. Pirates of the Carribean? We'll work something out with 7th Sea (-cough- Pirates of the Spanish Main -cough-). Anyway, the hobby gaming industry I think is a spot missed by many SF&F fans. The most obvious ones of course are the RPG supplements.

For example, one thing Glen Cook's The Black Company series always lacked was a decent map. Green Ronin's The Black Company Campaign Setting not only contains maps of the world but includes a geography lesson of the setting and a brief summary of all the novels. Guardians of Order previously released a campaign setting on George R.R. Martin's A Song of Ice and Fire (the RPG license is now with Green Ronin) and it included not only artwork for the series but a history and timeline as well. During the recent cosplay competition at the Manila International Book Fair, one of the cosplayers dressed up as Ser Barrister Selmy. I didn't recall that he was dressed in such ornate armor but when the cosplayer showed me the source of his inspiration, it was from the Game of Thrones Collectible Card Game (CCG) from Fantasy Flight Games. The Wheel of Time RPG from Wizards of the Coast, while perhaps not as full of information as the two other RPG books mentioned, is nonetheless a good repository of Wheel of Time artwork and has an interesting bestiary and close-up maps of the city of Caemlyn and Illian to name a few.

It's not limited to just RPG books though. Various franchises have spawned numerous products that include board games, CCGs, video games, and comics. Not every writer gets a chance to publish a Silmarillion or The History of Middle-Earth but various material are released that expand and built upon the world. At the very least, works that are deceased (or on "hiatus" depending on your faith) such as Serenity might find new life in an RPG book or continued in a comic line which was the case with Buffy the Vampire Slayer. An example of an adaptation that made a big impact in its field was the video game Dune 2000, based on Frank Herbert's Dune. Dune 2000 was basically the inspiration for the ever-popular Warcraft franchise that came to dominate the RTS genre during the 90's. Peter Jackson's Lord of the Rings arguably changed the way how movies are made and was a big boon to New Zealand (well, Lord of the Rings and Power Rangers). It's all interesting to witness how a novel or franchise can branch out to other mediums and make a huge impact.

Tuesday, September 18, 2007

The Epic Fantasy of Hugh Cook

I get a warm, fuzzy feeling whenever I get to bounce off the post of other bloggers. I was going through My Elves are Different and he name drops Hugh Cook, an author of a 10-book epic series. Now I'm unfamiliar with Hugh Cook so I do a quick Wikipedia research. Apparently his Chronicles of an Age of Darkness series was originally intended to be twenty novels long, succeeded by two equally lengthy series (making it a 60-book epic!). Unfortunately, it wasn't to be so (don't worry, Cook is still alive).

Buy Books to Help Fight Cancer

Pat of Pat's Fantasy Hotlist will be donating his earnings from Amazon Associates Program to the Canadian Breast Cancer Foundation. Here's how it works:
Hence, from here on to December 31st, I will donate the proceeds of my Amazon Associates Programs to the Canadian Breast Cancer Foundation. Granted, I've been an associates for over a year, and I've accrued the sum of about 50$ in that span of time. Not exactly the kind of amount which can make a different, some would say. But I disagree. In such an andeavor, every single penny counts.

So if you want to help, all you need to do is click on any of my Amazon links (the Canada, USA, Europe links you see in various posts) and purchase your stuff from there. It doesn't matter if you wish to buy that particular novel or not. As soon as you click on those links, you're good to go!:-) So whether you're shopping for books, DVDs, CDs, yada yada yada, old and new, every purchase you make will help raise funds to find a cure for Breast Cancer. You don't need to spend more, to donate any of your hard-earned dough, or to do anything special to support this worthy cause. Simply click on a link before buying whatever it is you want. As crazy as it sounds, it's as simple as that! With new releases from Brooks, Martin, Pratchett, Novik, Goodkind and so many more already out or on the way, it's never been easier to do a good deed when buying books by your favorite SFF writers.

When Writers Die

Perhaps one of the ironic things in life is that a creator's construct is able to outlive its progenitor. In terms of writing, an author's novel or short story might be remembered far longer and in more detail than the writer himself. Aristotle, Jesus Christ, or even Shakespeare could have been a mere footnote in history if written records did not exist. Instead, they are thrust into the limelight and their fictional adventures intertwines with actual events. But for the most part, these are individuals whose life's work can be measured with a beginning and an end. The biggest tragedy are those people who leave this world with unfinished business, more so the death of a writer. Entire worlds are left hanging, open, and without closure. Writers and historians of future generations might exploit this potential but in the meantime, fans and readers will never experience the writer's vision of the world they created.

The first writer that comes to mind is Franz Kafka. He wasn't a starving artist but he was plagued by sickness and worse--literary rejection. He had few works published in his lifetime but they were met with dismal failure to the point that on his deathbed, he requested that all his work be disposed of, never to see the light of day. Fortunately for us, his friend Max Brod went against his wishes and published the recovered writings of Kafka. While Kafka would be best-known for his story The Metamorphosis, he has attempted to write a few novels and many of them were published even if they remain unfinished (The Castle and The Trial). One wonders what could have happened if Kafka had attained literary acceptance during his lifetime instead of his post-mortem acclaim (and perhaps one of the signs of Kafka's impact in literature is the fact that we have an adjective attributed to him: Kafkaesque).

Genre fiction, on the other hand, has attempted to continue the legacies of deceased authors. Isaac Asimov had his Foundation series and Robert Ludlum had his Jason Bourne series. While the novels in both were self-contained and had a definite end, the publishers deemed it profitable to continue the line and so we have the likes of Gregory Benford, Greg Bear, and David Brin writing one Foundation novel each while Eric Van Lustbader contributed two sequels to the Jason Bourne saga. But for the most part, these sequels are non-essential and purist fans of the original authors could easily ignore the books written by these modern writers and lose out on nothing.

As unlikely as it seems, writers are not immune to tragedy and it seems to strike at the most inappropriate of times. There are cases when writers are struck down before their life's work can be finished. One of the more defiant but ultimately futile gestures I read was of manga creator Shotaro Ishinomori who is responsible for creating the likes of Cyborg 009 and Kamen Rider. While the latter lives on to this very day and is part of Japan's cultural identity (along the same lines as Godzilla, Ultraman, and Pokemon), Cyborg 009 is a special series because Ishinomori faced the same circumstances which led to Sir Arthur Conan Doyle resurrecting his popular fictional character Sherlock Holmes. After devising a brilliant but tragic ending for the series, Ishinomori was forced to resurrect his Cyborg 009 protagonist due to fan clamor. The series ended in 1981 but it is rumored that before he was sent to the ER, Ishinomori defiantly told his doctors that he could not die yet because he still had to write a "true ending" for Cyborg 009. That would have been a great story in itself but Ishinomori did not survive and passed away in 1998.

One of the great science fiction epics is Dune by Frank Herbert. For some SF&F fans however, the original novel was the only book in the series worth reading (and it worked quite well because it stood well on its own). Herbert wrote five of the sequels himself and he was going about the 7th novel when he died of pulmonary embolism in 1986. He left an outline however and this served as the basis for the prequels and sequels his son Brian Herbert and SF author Kevin J. Anderson wrote. If some purist fans disliked the sequels the original Herbert wrote, how much more was their reaction to these estranged novels that were a pale shadow of the deceased author? (I assume they actually sold well considering there's at least 8 Dune books in which Herbert Jr. teams up with Anderson.) I followed Herbert's Dune series faithfully though and I can't help but wonder what would have happened if Frank himself wrote the ever-elusive book seven.

Lately it's fantasy who has taken a big blow with the demise of Robert Jordan. His greatest body of work is neither his Fallon series nor his Conan: The Barbarian novels but rather the 12-novel epic Wheel of Time. Of course when he started writing the series, no one really knew (not even the author himself) that the books would stretch to a dozen titles. Some would argue that the Wheel of Time made it possible for series's like Malazan Book of the Fallen, The Sword of Truth, and A Song of Ice and Fire to be published. While the serial novel is by no means unique to fantasy, Jordan and his ilk ushered in a new sub-genre of adult fantasy that involved interlinked novels that were nearly a thousand pages long (some even surpassing that number) and broke the trilogy formula (although there are a lot of previous writers who did not write in trilogies). (As an aside, it's also interesting to note that while not as popular as Wheel of Time, Margaret Weis and Tracy Hickman saw the publication of their own seven-book epic The Death Gate Cycle at nearly the same time.) Sadly, one book shy of finishing the epic, Jordan died on September 16, 2007. Some fans can't help but compare his fate to Frank Herbert. What's disconcerting is that lightning has indeed struck twice and I imagine this won't be the only time such an event will occur. (Maybe that's the new catchphrase--he/she pulled a "Frank Hebert/Robert Jordan".) Will Jordan's work live on? Certainly. But one will always wonder what it would have been like had Jordan had a few more months to complete his epic. What makes me admire Jordan is that like Ishinomori, he fought 'til the end, struggling and dreaming of stories to write even as the shadow of death loomed over him. The greatest stories ever told aren't necessarily the ones in fiction. The likes of Jordan show us that a writer's life can be as exciting and courageous as the stories the author writes.

Monday, September 17, 2007

Robert Jordan Oct. 17, 1948 - Sept. 16, 2007

Rames Rigney a.k.a. Robert Jordan just passed away. Most SF&F fans might know him for his fantasy epic The Wheel of Time. It was a 12-book series and perhaps right now, my guiltiest thoughts isn't that a great man passed away but that we'll never get to read the 12th and final novel.

Everyone is probably checking his blog, Dragonmount, where the announcement was made. Unfortunately, I don't think their server can handle the bandwidth. Here's what Wilson posted:

It is with great sadness that I tell you that the Dragon is gone. RJ left us today at 2:45 PM. He fought a valiant fight against this most horrid disease. In the end, he left peacefully and in no pain. In the years he had fought this, he taught me much about living and about facing death. He never waivered in his faith, nor questioned our God’s timing. I could not possibly be more proud of anyone. I am eternally grateful for the time that I had with him on this earth and look forward to our reunion, though as I told him this afternoon, not yet. I love you bubba.

Our beloved Harriet was at his side through the entire fight and to the end. The last words from his mouth were to tell her that he loved her.

Thank each and everyone of you for your prayers and support through this ordeal. He knew you were there. Harriet reminded him today that she was very proud of the many lives he had touched through his work. We’ve all felt the love that you’ve been sending my brother/cousin. Please keep it coming as our Harriet could use the support.

Jason will be posting funeral arrangements.

My sincerest thanks.

Peace and Light be with each of you,

Wilson
Brother/Cousin
4th of 3

To Catalyst: Never, never loose faith. RJ did not. Harriet hasn’t. I haven’t. Going through what we have, our faith is only strengthened. Besides, if God didn’t exist, we would have never had Jim. We did. God does. Remember my Brother/Cousin, my friend, think of him fondly and glorify God’s name.

New Worlds 5: The 5th Philippine Science Fiction and Fantasy Convention

The Philippines might not have a Gen Con or a Dragon Con but thankfully we still have conventions dedicated to niches like genre. Anyway, one of the annual conventions is by the New Worlds Alliance (and for me New Worlds Alliance is an interesting organization because it's not exactly one group but actually lives up to is name and is composed of several different randoms). Here's the plug for the event:
The New Worlds Alliance presents
New Worlds 5: The 5th Philippine Science Fiction and Fantasy Convention
October 27, 2007
Glorietta Activity Center

http://www.newworlds.ph

Sunday, September 16, 2007

The Return of Pulp Sword & Sorcery

From Paizo Blog

For me, tabletop RPG publishers have been a boon for fiction not just because of the gaming material they churn out but due to their fiction as well. The most obvious is the giant TSR which was succeeded by Wizards of the Coast. Where would be our Forgotten Realms and Dragonlance without them? (That's not to include many of the fantasies that have been inspired by Dungeons & Dragons such as Raymond E. Feist's Magician.) However, what really got me excited was when White Wolf reprinted previously unavailable (in the US) classics of fantasy such as Michael Moorcock's Eternal Guardian series or Fritz Leiber's Lankhmar.

Unfortunately, as much as a lot of tabletop gamers are SF&F fans, not all SF&F fans are gamers and so finds like those aren't always evident. Anyway, one of the more not-so-recent announcements is that Paizo Publishing is printing some Sword & Sorcery-style fiction under its Planet Stories label. We have the likes of Gary Gygax (D&D's creator), Michael "Multiverse" Moorcock, C.L. Moore (one of the earliest female Sword & Sorcery writers), and Robert E. Howard, among others.

Anyway, Black Gate has an interview with the publisher, Erik Mona. Here's an excerpt:
Some of the books in the Planet Stories line will surprise you. Late next year we plan to release a monster of a book called The Walrus and the Warwolf, by a writer from New Zealand named Hugh Cook. It's a sprawling, baroque fantasy filled with pirates, swordplay, magic, and world-building that approaches Vance in its elegance. It's the fourth in a ten-part non-linear series called The Chronicles of an Age of Darkness that only made it a handful of badly-cut books in America in the late ’80s. I loved the books then and tracked them down on family trips to the UK, finally assembling a complete set I've since read three times. Over here the first books were published as Wizard War, The Questing Hero, The Hero Returns, The Oracle, and Lords of the Sword. I'd love to be able to publish more installments of that great series, and strong sales of The Walrus and the Warwolf will virtually guarantee that happening.

Wednesday, September 12, 2007

Collections

I just finished reading Dean's Kite of Stars and Other Stories and it's a diverse collection of stories. I was talking to Dean about it during LitCrit and pointed out that one problem I had when looking at the table of contents is that as a friend and follower of his work, it's honestly not as huge and exciting for me. The problem of course is familiarity. Half the stories in the collection, I've already read in some form or another. And this just doesn't apply to Dean but to other authors I'm following. I love Jeffrey Ford's work and I have both of his short story collections, The Fantasy Writer's Assistant and The Empire of Ice Cream. Unfortunately, I skipped a lot of the stories in the former simply because I had read them already from other sources such as the Year's Best Fantasy and Horror anthology. I really appreciated The Empire of Ice Cream mainly because at the time, I decreased my reading pile of SF&F work so discovering his new stories in that collection was a real treat.

What more with mainstream authors? I mean I love Neil Gaiman but as a reader, when I buy his collection like Fragile Things or M is for Magic, there's a decrease in enthusiasm because he's so popular that most likely, I'd have read most of the stories featured in those collections. (It's actually recommended that you live in a cave before picking up those books.) China Mieville's Jake and Other Stories was a welcome surprise mainly because I don't follow the author as extensively (his writing isn't endearing to everyone).

How about you? Do you feel the same experience when reading short story collections? That's why for Dean (and me), he looks more forward to anthologies. Because you're not just exposed to one author but a gamut of writers with (hopefully) different writing styles and techniques. I also think it's more likely that you'll fall in love with more stories in an anthology (where each author supposedly showcases their best stuff) as opposed to a collection (where the "stronger" piece of the author might overshadow the rest of the stories). Of course I don't have data to back up that conclusion aside from my own experience.

Tuesday, September 11, 2007

Philippine Fantasy World

What Tolkien made popular when he published Lord of the Rings was the creation--the mythology--of an entirely different world. Ever since then, a lot of SF&F writers built cosmologies from the ground up or incorporated alien worlds into their fiction. Some worked and some fell flat. It's probably had such a huge effect that world-building is a point of contention among writers and readers, how much to reveal and how much not to reveal, to info dump vs. seeding it slowly, or whether world-building is even necessary.

Many would-be Filipino writers have tried building their own cosmology based on our history and location. The country's equivalent of the Wild West seems to be the Spanish Colonial era where we suffered under "oppression", rebelled against our Spanish enslavers, and eventually won our freedom. (Few Filipinos apparently find the political strife of our American colonization to be relatively uninteresting unless you count the Japanese occupation during World War II.) A friend had such a draft, calling his world Mahadlika, for use in his own campaign setting.

Of course what some Filipinos don't know is that we already have such an epic world, a Middle-Earth of our own, and it's been in existence for years. It's one fact that I think that has been omitted in many of Dean Alfar's interviews. I haven't known him for a long time but back when he was still famous for writing comics rather than -gasp- novels, Dean along with some of his friends were already working on the fantasy world called Hinirang. (You'll have to ask Dean who thought of the name Hinirang.) The website that housed the stories and mythology is now gone (or perhaps hidden in some server) and more than one writer contributed to this shared world. Perhaps the existence of Hinirang is not so evident because of Dean's writing style. He doesn't info dump, he doesn't start his stories with narratives of the world. Hinirang is simply the setting where some of his stories are told. In fact, if you've read some of his stories, you probably didn't notice that it was set in Hinirang but rather thought it was a generic fantastical Philippine setting. Yet it all starts to make sense if you read his stories as a whole instead of chunks. Some of his stories that take place in Hinirang include (but not limited to):

Friday, September 07, 2007

EXPEDITIONS: The 1st Philippine Graphic Fiction Awards Compilation

From Fully Booked Online
COMING SOON!

The long-awaited book compilation of the winning entries from the 1st Philippine Graphic Fiction Awards will be launched by end-November at Fully Booked Bonifacio High Street, together with the awarding ceremony of the 2nd Philippine Graphic Fiction competition with Neil Gaiman as co-presentor!

Entitled, "EXPEDITIONS" the book will compose two parts: Prose Fiction and Comics.

EXPEDITIONS Fiction features the winning stories, "The God Equation," "A Strange Map of Time," "The Great Philippine Space Mission," "The Omega Project," and "Atha" as well as selected short listed works. EXPEDITIONS Comics will showcase the winning "Hika Girl," " SPLAT!," "Defiant: The Battle of Mactan," and "Dusk" along with selected short-listed entries.

As promised, the Foreword is written by Neil Gaiman, with the cover art by Leinil Francis Yu.

Details on the book launch will be announced soon.

Monday, September 03, 2007

The 2nd Philippine Graphic/Fiction Awards

I apparently missed it last week but here's the plug from Fully Booked's website:
Award-winning author Neil Gaiman and Fully Booked present:

The 2nd Philippine Graphic/Fiction Awards!

Calling all Filipino writers, artists, and just about anyone with a wild imagination! Neil Gaiman wants YOU to join this nationwide writing competition to seek out excellent work in two categories: comics and prose fiction.

The contest starts on September 1 and deadline of submission of entries is on October 31, 2007.

Over P300,000 in prizes, including P100,000 grand prize for the first place winners!

COMIC BOOK WRITING CONTEST:
1st Prize - P100,000
2nd Prize - P30,000
3rd Prize - P15,000

SCIENCE FICTION/FANTASY/HORROR WRITING CONTEST:
1st Prize - P100,000
2nd Prize - P30,000
3rd Prize - P15,000

Downloads:
Contest Guidelines
Official Application Form

Sunday, September 02, 2007

Shelving Books by Genre/Series and Pseudonyms

Visiting the book fair (which is honestly more of a book bazaar), one of the exhibitors I really disliked was Powerbooks. Not really apprehension but more of an inconvenience. The books weren't arranged by genre but rather by author. Whether you're fantasy, romance, horror, or general fiction, you were all lumped into the set of shelves. Which is fine if you have a small collection of books but not quite appropriate when you have dozens of shelves arranged in that way and a finite amount of time to browse through the books. Thankfully, this arrangement only applies to the book fair and not to their other branches. But what I do find peculiar at various bookstores to a lesser extent is how some books in a particular genre (in my personal experience, fantasy/science fiction) aren't shelved by series but by author. Troy Denning authoring a Forgotten Realms novel might be in the opposite side as R.A. Salvatore or Ed Greenwood, even if they're part of the same series. The same goes for other books penned by different authors but sharing the same world such as Thieves World or Conan. Or it might be a special reprint edition such as the SF Masterwork series or the Fantasy Masterwork series. It's convenient to have them in one area, arranged by series, instead of simply by author name. Personally, I prefer a mixed compromise between the two, a shelf being arranged by series (i.e. one area has all the Dragonlance novels, another area all the Lankhmar books) and then the rest of the shelf arranged by author (but hopefully the books of the author are arranged according to book chronology instead of alphabetically--in mysteries for example, having the top row of the shelf being occupied by Agatha Christie's Ms. Marple series instead of mixing it up with Poirot and Parker Pyne).

I was reading the last print issue of Dragon magazine and they have a featured entitled Unsolved Mysteries of D&D. There, they explain the author names Richard Awlinson and T.H. Lain (the latter I knew from a D&D article on the Wizards of the Coast site) are pseudonyms for several writers--the former for the Shadowdale trilogy set in Forgotten Realms and the latter D&D's iconic series. They state that the reason for doing so is so that the books get lumped in the same area of the shelf (and in the case of Richard "All-in-One" Awlinson, revealed the original authors in subsequent reprints). Of course this isn't the only application of collective ghost writers using pseudonyms. I always wondered how prolific Franklin W. Dixon could be writing all those Hardy Boys books (and the same applies for Carolyn Keene and Nancy Drew). It was a mixed surprise later on when I found out they were in actuality written by several different writers. And in many ways, I think the reason for adopting those pseudonyms isn't just to shelve the books in the same area but to give readers the illusion that they were all written by this one great author.

Wednesday, August 29, 2007

Reading Preferences

While I’m a fan of both science fiction and fantasy, I consider myself more of the latter. Perhaps this distinction makes itself more pronounced when it comes to my reading preferences, especially when it comes to the “classics”. When it comes to fantasy, I honestly abhor J.R.R. Tolkien and C.S. Lewis, instead preferring George R. R. Martin and Philip Pullman respectively. In many ways, I’m more modern when it comes to fantasy and generally aware of the upcoming writers in the field (and the intrigues that surround them). Science fiction, on the other hand, is the complete opposite. I don’t think I can really name a modern science fiction author aside from those that were still writing back in the “golden era” of science fiction: Arthur C. Clarke, William Gibson, Greg Bear. When I speak of science fiction works that I read and enjoy, I instantly go for the well-known classics such as Philip K. Dick, Isaac Asimov, and Alfred Bester.

I think this strange tug of war between “classical literature” and “modern literature” is becoming more and more essential in genre fiction. Because as much as the critics might dismiss genre fiction, those familiar with the field know that there’s growth and evolution in those specific genres. Modern horror for example has veered away (and sometimes revisits) the likes of H.P. Lovecraft and Ira Levin. More than one fantasy has veered away from Tolkienesque worlds or even the trilogy packaging, instead opting for shorter or even longer, more dramatic works. Science fiction I think has drifted from conceptual science fiction and political science fiction but has slowly moved into the field of hard science fiction (a fact made possible that the present is indeed the science fiction of three decades ago). I’m sure there are also other developments in genres I’m not quite familiar with but the fact is, there’s really much growth and evolution happening. I won’t even delve into interstitial fiction, speculative fiction, and other types of fiction that fuses, combines, and remixes various genres.

And at the end of the day, today’s modern genre will become tomorrow’s classics. Authors like Kelly Link and Jeffrey Ford and Jeff Vandermeer seem poised to take the spot when we talk of literary fantasy for example. George R. R. Martin, Robert Jordan, and Steven Erikson have redefined epic fantasy. No one really knows what to make of China Mieville but he’ll certainly be nominated for a spot somewhere. And then there’s the fan-favorite Neil Gaiman, the same author who gave us the dark Coraline, the urban American Gods, and my latest bet, Interworld.

I can’t help how readers three generations from now will look at these authors. Will there be disdain or appreciation? What new writing styles will rise and dethrone these uncrowned kings of genre?

Monday, August 20, 2007

Politics and Religion in Fiction

They say that when you want to strike a conversation with a stranger, avoid topics concerning politics or religion: it’s unlikely you’ll both agree and what would have been a friendly chit-chat turns into a heated debate. However, I do think those two factors are quite integral to us as human beings, and they easily shape our psyche and paradigm of the world—which in turn influence what we read and how we interpret them.

Take for example George Orwell’s Animal Farm or even 1984. Why do we easily consider them classics but not the likes of Mein Kampf? I do think modern readers are biased towards texts that are more sympathetic to their political beliefs and in my case and in the case of the West, that usually means democratic ideals more than communist philosophies (of course to be fair to Communism, I think the flaw isn’t necessarily in the intent but rather in the execution in which it presupposes altruism in our leaders and our citizens, while Democracy pre-supposes self-interest).


As a SF&F fan, living in a conservative country and family can be trying, whether you’re Catholic or even Christian. Reading any book that incorporates magic is easily assumed to be evil, just as reading any text that has a pantheon of deities or even the lack of one. It also seems unfair that you can’t have evil antagonists in your fiction to be considered wholesome: you can’t have demons or devils as they are perceived as corrupting forces by zealots. Something as benign as Harry Potter is perceived as blasphemous for the sole reason that the main character uses magic. Don’t even get me started with playing games like Dungeons & Dragons. Just because there’s a demon or a devil in the Monster Manual, some fanatics think that the point of the game is to worship them when in fact it’s not—gamers are out to kill demons and devils (and hopefully loot their bodies and plunder their wealth). Perhaps it wouldn’t be so bad if people were consistent but we can be blind to our own prejudices. The same condemners who are defiant at something like Lord of the Rings praise books like Chronicles of Narnia despite the fact that Tolkien and Lewis were friends, or the fact that the latter work also has protagonists using magic. There’s even an author who was ostracized by his mother for the sake of religion because his latest novel has a protagonist who was a lesbian but she didn’t seem to have a qualm with the previous protagonists who were murderers (and even if being gay was a sin, I’d choose the former over the latter any day). I also remember seeing the Left Behind series in our church’s bookstore and for a good time, that series occupied a good chunk of shelf space in the fiction section of the local bookstore although why it was there and not in the SF&F section (in which it could have easily fit in) I can’t imagine why (actually I can: it’s marketing).


In many ways, it begs the question: is good writing nonetheless good writing irregardless of your political or religious beliefs? Is it even possible to judge writing solely on the basis of writing alone, stripped of any morality or political ideology? Better yet, should literature exist in a vacuum? As much as I’m tempted to stick with an objective truth, that’s simply not the case in the real world. We compare not just with what’s been written before and in the present but similarly how it affects us. If I were to write Neuromancer today for example, it wouldn’t be well received considering it was written two decades ago by William Gibson (or the fact that Philip K Dick wrote Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? before that). And in many ways, Pattern Recognition has more resonance with today’s readers than Neuromancer because of the ideas and concepts the former tackles that wasn’t necessarily evident to the public in the 80’s but a definite hallmark of the 21st century (similarly, if Neuromancer had been published a decade earlier, would it have been as well received?).


When it comes to politics and religion, I do think the two play an integral role in what we deem as good reading. Shakespeare for example wouldn’t resonate so strongly if he didn’t tackle the human condition (and isn’t that why critic Harold Bloom loves him so much?). The Bible is popular not necessarily because of its skillful writing (Psalms and Proverbs aside) but rather due to the hope and ideas it conveys (and if there’s any lyrical prose in the Bible, a lot of it has probably been lost in the translation which has taken a more functional form—just look at the Peter and “rock” pun which probably only scholars would understand). An example closer to home is science fiction. More so than any genre, a lot of readers come to science fiction for its ideas and concepts that typically revolve around politics, religion, or both. Just look at what we consider classics: Flowers for Algernon, Fahrenheit 451, or The Giver. They’re science fiction books not necessarily for the science but because they talk about the human condition, the political landscape of their times, the attempt at finding an utopia (and I think utopian societies are the nigh-unreachable goals of any political system or religious belief—the tragedy of the Knights of the Round Table was that it was a political system that espouses equality in a feudal society and isn’t heaven or Elysium or nirvana the perfect society we’re all looking for that religion conveniently provides?).


Even authors aren’t immune. The Wizard of Earthsea trilogy for example is a beautiful series on the literal level but Ursula K le Guin went about ret-conning the events that took place in the first three books in her sequels because she took offense at what she had written—the newer Earthsea books are definitely a reflection of her new political and religious outlook. Terry Goodkind, on the other hand, was fiercely political when he was writing the middle of the Sword of Truth series and was attempting the fantasy equivalent of Animal Farm (at that point, I dropped Goodkind because his propaganda came at the price of moving the story forward).


That’s not to say that books should be moralistic or worse, didactic, in order for them to be classics or good reads but rather I do think that society’s hierarchy of values certainly plays a significant role in how we read books and better yet, how we react to them. Gulliver’s Travels for example probably wouldn’t have been considered a classic if it wasn’t such a political allegory for its time. It’s the same reason why the church is reacting so strongly towards The Da Vinci Code (and why the masses got caught up in it the first place) even if at the end of the day, the story wasn’t originally intended as counter-propaganda more than a storytelling vehicle. Book banning and censorship is another example of society’s attempt to revise their political and religious belief, as if the political incorrectness of the authors that have gone before them are reflective of their current society: negroes instead of African Americans, Indians instead of Native Americans. And not surprisingly, some modern readers do react so strongly to such bodies of work that simply used the language of its time and reflective of its current society. That’s not to say that these complaints are justified but the heart of the argument can be traced to one’s ideologies and why these books were placed in the canon in the first place.


I think one fact that we readers can take comfort in is that fiction is so highly-prized that such issues can come about: we care enough about the books we read that we want to revise them or failing that, censor or outright ban them. Works of fiction is given the same treatment and focus as we would history books, even if the former claims to be lies while the latter truth. I think that on a subconscious level, people are aware that history is about as subjective as fiction, albeit with more research. And at the end of the day, what character in fiction is devoid of politics or religion, even if these political and religious beliefs are fictional (i.e. psychohistory in Foundation). Perhaps those facts make fiction resonate so strongly to the reader even if the story is something as simple as Humpty Dumpty (I was tempted to use Jack and Jill but I’m sure the feminists would find a way to condemn/praise the portrayal of Jill or simply the title itself—just goes to show that we can read politics/religion into anything).

Thursday, August 16, 2007

Selling RPG Books (and Books in a Series)

Here in the Philippines, RPG books like Dungeons & Dragons have baffled bookstores (and even some comic and gaming shops). Even as a gamer myself, I have problems pinning down exactly what category RPGs should fall under. Are they fiction? Well, some parts of an RPG book might have fiction but by no means is there a huge narrative, just excerpts. Is it nonfiction? Well, depends on your expectations. If you expect RPG books to be accurately historical based on the real world, they’re not. But they do have histories and geographical notes of fictional worlds. In many ways, they’re also meta as they address the reader and often distinguish between the real world and its make-believe setting.

Now for most bookstores and retailers, books are units that need to be moved. The only distinction they’ll make between The Da Vinci Code and Neuromancer is that the former sells more (in the Philippines) in comparison to the latter and attempt to acquire books more like the former in hopes of moving stock. Which isn’t necessarily wrong mind you but can become finicky when it comes to novels that are serials or part of a series.

When I mention books that are serials or part of a series, I’m really talking about two kinds of books. One are stand-alone books. Harry Potter is an example of one. It has seven books in the series yet I can honestly read any book in any order (although of course to maximize understand and enjoyment, you read them in a specific order) nor do I need to have read the previous book in order to grasp the current story. In this case, whether the bookstore stocks book one or book seven of the series doesn’t really matter—as far as the bookstore is concerned, they think it’ll sell. If you see bookstores stocking the entire series of Harry Potter, I don’t think (but obviously this is a presumption as I am not privy to any bookstore’s strategies) it’s because they think readers will be baffled if you read book seven without reading book one but rather because they can sell you books one to seven instead of just a single book. In many ways, books in a series can be simpler than say, a stand-alone novel like The Da Vinci code because it has a built-in system as to what are other “similar” books.

Of course the series system of books isn’t perfect. Trips to the local bookstore show that every SF&F section has a Forgotten Realms and Dragonlance section. Now as much as literary fans might bash those two derivative series’, the fact of the matter is that those kinds of books sell. Forgotten Realms and Dragonlance are really popular, at least to the mainstream SF&F crowd. The mistake of bookstores however is that while they know the series is popular, they don’t know which specific books in the series are popular. Because as much as there’s good, fun novels in those series, there’s also a ton of mediocre and bad ones. I’d also like to point out that the number of books in both series is almost approaching two hundred. I can probably say that a reading fan’s preference will probably be only an eighth of that number and that’s a kind estimate. To be fair, that observation is a generalization on my part. I’ve seen National Bookstore blindly acquire Dragonlance titles that are horrible and didn’t stock any of the good ones. On the other hand, I’ve seen what I presume to be is the manager of A Different Bookstore in Eastwood give a prospective customer an entire lecture on R.A. Salvatore’s Forgotten Realms novels so there are exceptions to the norm. (And I think it’s the independent bookstores who’ve managed to distinguish between their customer’s tastes, something that will eventually be lost in bigger bookstore chains unless they have a diligent book buyer or passionate customer service department.)

The other type of series is those that hinge upon books that have preceded and succeeded it. Basically, it’s the novels that leave you hanging. A couple of “recommended reading” in SF&F are these kinds of books and it’s not immediately obvious that these books have sequels. At least that was what I felt when I read Neuromancer and The Cat Who Walks Through Walls. It made me wonder whether I was just stupid (a fact) or if there was something I just missed (apparently, I missed out that “hey, I have sequels and you need to read them”). Epic fantasy is also symptomatic of this. I think book one of the Wheel of Time could stand well on its own but not so for the rest of the books. Either that or it simply has a weird, non-traditional pacing. In other words, these books not only lack a satisfying ending if read independently but they also don’t have a cohesive beginning. The best way to read Lord of the Rings for example is by going through Fellowship of the Ring first followed by The Two Towers and finally Return of the King. Anything else will leave you bored or flabbergasted. So common sense would dictate that bookstores should stock the entire series, not just one book in the series arbitrarily (and not even the first book at that). But I’ve seen it happen—The Two Towers gets stocked at National Bookstore with none of its two companions in sight. Return of the King only shows up six months later and by then, The Two Towers is gone. Or how many times have you visited the bookstore hoping to get into a new series such as The Song of Ice and Fire only to find out that book one is missing? Thankfully these days, bookstores are slightly smarter about it (the movies help, not just in encouraging them to stock the books but to actually research on them; I also think healthy competition is another factor) but that’s not always case. And the fact of the matter is, they don’t need to be—such a method will still sell. I’ve heard stories of bibliophiles buying The Two Towers anyway even if the bookstore isn’t stocking Fellowship of the Ring. They’ll either wait for it to pop up some place else or borrow from a friend or library. And in many ways, that’s what’s fun about book shopping here in this country—they’re hard to collect and it gives you a sense of accomplishment when you’ve actually accomplished it, especially when you’re ransacking different bookstores or buying them pre-owned. My Thomas Covenant books were independent purchases at Book Sale over the course of a few months but hey, I got the series didn’t I? Bibliophiles aren’t always interested in just the literature, sometimes they answer a natural human impulse: the art of collecting (which is evident not just in stamp collecting but in fetishes or more addictive pastimes such as trading cards and Collectible Card Games). The other, less-benevolent reason is that sometimes, people buy them simply because they’re there and no alternative is in sight. I remember back before independent bookstores started popping up, I ended up owning five dozen Dragonlance books simply because those were the only fantasy material being stocked in the bookstore and I was desperate for fantasy reading.

Now let me return to RPG books: neither method will really satisfy RPG book buyers. I’ve seen National Bookstore stock a D&D adventure and that’s the only D&D book they had. Obviously, it won’t sell because that adventure book doesn’t have the rules on how to run the game. For that, you need The Player’s Handbook, The Dungeon Master’s Guide, and The Monster’s Manual. The first teaches players how to play the game while the latter two are for game masters, the people who run the game (they pretty much act like the computer, giving the game its narrative and form and challenge). The publisher, Wizards of the Coast, knows this. In fact, these three books are their best-selling merchandise. Yet they continue to release supplements month after month. What most bookstores and retailers don’t realize is that these supplements and adventures aren’t just there to sell, they’re there to plug the three books needed to play the game. I buy almost every D&D supplement that comes out but I’m the exception rather than the norm. Most people will selectively buy supplements. The only consistent books they bought are the three I mentioned. And that’s the heart of the problem I think. Bookstores are working on a different paradigm. They think that by stocking the latest supplements, they’ll sell D&D books when that’s not really the case. The supplements are there to drive up the sales of the big three but unfortunately, the big three aren’t always being stocked.

When it comes to RPG books, I think the paradigm that they should be operating is more like a console system and games. Console systems are game machines like the X-Box 360, the Sony Playstation 3, and the Nintendo Wii. When a third party game publisher produces a game, their maximum quantity will be the number of units sold of the console system. Nintendo for example won’t be selling 1 million units of the game Wii Sports if they only sold half as many Nintendo Wii’s. Wii Sports at best should stock as many Nintendo Wii’s sold (thankfully for the company, the latter is a really, really high number). I'm not saying that's a hard and fast rule but it's really no surprise that one of the reasons Atari eventually crashed in the 80's was because it produced more games than consoles sold. D&D books operate on a similar level: you won’t sell more supplements than the number of Player’s Handbook you’ve sold for example. And that fact is an entirely different business paradigm, at least one that most bookstores aren't used to.

Tuesday, August 07, 2007

World Building

The concept of world building usually comes into play in science-fiction and fantasy because well, most world building in realist stories are based on the real world (that's not to say realist writers don't have to do some world building... they do, they just don't have to describe what an automobile is when they mention it in their stories for example). Of course having said that, I think as a reader, I don't want to see world building in novels. I'm there for the stories after all.

Now let me clarify that statement. When I say I don't want to see world building in stories, I don't mean there's no world building at all. What that simply means is that the world building happens in the background, not shoved down our throats. For example, Lord of the Rings has world building but it takes place as part of the story. The same goes for the Belgariad and the Mallorean. The Silmarillion and the Rivan Codex, on the other hand, are books about the world (and in the case of the latter, more or less the series's bible). They don't make interesting reading in themselves, unless you're a fan of their respective series. I don't think anyone would enjoy reading Rivan Codex for example without reading the Belgariad first (of course like all things, there will be exceptions). As a writer however, I'm curious about these kinds of stuff, but at the end of the day, world building isn't something I'd give to a typical reader (even a genre reader). The most world-building I've read in an actual novel is probably the first chapter in The Stars My Destination. The rest of the book quickly shifts to the actual narrative after that, however, so I'm okay with it.

Now RPG books, on the other hand, are different. There are basically two reasons why people buy RPG books: they either buy it for the game system, or they buy it for the world building. I mean I used to have the Forgotten Realms Campaign Setting at home and currently the Eberron Campaign Setting and a good chunk of the books are about histories and geographical descriptions and cultures of fictitious worlds. When I bought those books, I knew this was what I was buying. And while I derive pleasure from reading these fictional facts, it's only because I know they're a means to an end and that I'll subvert them for my own narrative or campaign. The closest thing I have to a narrative in those books are the histories but everything else, I'm thinking "how do I use this in my game?" and it's because of those kinds of thoughts that I find them interesting and useful.

At the end of the day, it's about finding the right tool for the right job. World building in fiction? Not so much. World building in gaming? Bring it on!

Tuesday, July 31, 2007

Anvil Fantasy

Aside from the fact that Dean Alfar's The Kite of Stars and Other Stories will be published soon, there's also the fact that it's going to be part of Anvil's new line, Anvil Fantasy. One step at a time, people!

Friday, July 13, 2007

Of Comics and Fantasy Novels

A decade ago, when I was starting to get into fantasy, one of my biggest hurdles to get into the genre was the fact that novels weren't complete--they were easily part 1 of a trilogy or something similar. And in many ways, I think that's a bad habit that publishers picked up from the publishers of Lord of the Rings (because it was supposed to be one really big book instead of three separate books). It's similarly something that the genre can't seem to shake off. A lot of fantasy novels are still packaged as trilogies. (Even David Eddings's Belgariad was originally a trilogy, until his publisher said there's no market for such a trilogy but there was if it was five smaller books.) I think the same problem extends to the US comic market as well. Collecting singles is a big pain in the ass, especially if it's a back issue. Graphic novels are a godsend, but not all comics are compiled into graphic novels. I think one "problem" the US comics market has is also the fact that the same title comes out in two forms: in singles and in trades. I mean if I have say, issues #1-3 of a title and issues #1-5 is collected into a trade paperback, if I can't track down the last two issues, I'm in a dilemma of whether I should buy the trade and therefore make my previous singles purchase invalid, or just continue to hold out and hope to strike it lucky in the future and find the other two issues I'm missing. And honestly, comic singles are more prone to loss than trade paperbacks due to sheer size of the latter and flimsiness with the former.

Now I'm not saying writers should write more standalone novels and comic writers should write more one-shots. Part of what I like about both mediums is the fact that they're not afraid to tell a really long story if necessary. And I think that's the qualifier: if it's necessary.

Of course it doesn't hurt if publishers start churning out more and more compilations. I mean in the UK, there's this term called Omnibus Editions. Basically they compile various novels or short stories into one big book. I like that format, even if they're usually released as hardcovers (hardcovers are difficult to pocket around). It's also interesting to see that in the indie comics market, a lot of creators are releasing their work not as singles but as trades. It makes their story more cohesive and one complete package--especially considering that they're indie and tracking a sequel or a prequel will be difficult to obtain, to say the least.

On the side of the consumer, I think this all arises from a design problem. Of course what one might see as a problem might be someone else's boon. I mean on the side of the publisher, if they were evil overlords, it's easy to imagine that this is all part of their scam to get more money out of its readers. But so far, despite these practices, the market seems to be content and no bubble is being burst. Yet.